The return of “you tell us” box

Saturday 8th December, 2007 | No Comments »

youtellus

Do you happen to remember the little form which had a background of two kids with silly look on their face? That feature which is also known as “QW drama - you tell us!” is finally back but without the background this time.

If you have no idea what is this all about you may want to take a look at the original post about this feature. The ones who are already familiar with this feature can find it at the sidebar “news -> you tell us!”.

DreamHack QW tournament games on Goldrush

Friday 30th November, 2007 | 4 Comments »

DreamHack - Goldrush

DreamHack Winter 2007 is now running with a QW tournament and there are alot of interesting games about to be played with famous players like reppie, locust, ParadokS and LocktaR among others. Most of these games will be open for bets at Goldrush.

QuakeWorld.nu has already started a solid coverage of the event, some notable entries:

Remember that you can watch all the games that are beeing played on DH using the latest version of ezQuake!

In case you’re annoyed by the slow results reporting on other websites, we will provide the scores right on time! Read more to find out who gibbed who!

(read more..)

QHLAN 11 open for signups

Tuesday 6th November, 2007 | 2 Comments »

qhlan

QH-to-the-LAN!

I just finished off the last modifications of the new website for QHLAN 11 and it’s now complete functionality-wise, but there is hardly any information about the event itself at all (yet);
(read more..)

Scholarly Journals in Quakeworld

Saturday 27th October, 2007 | 8 Comments »

For anyone in academia, virtually all of you know how to search a database of scholarly journals when you want to see studies performed on a particular subject of interest. For example, an undergraduate stoner may be inclined to use PubMed to search for the health effects of smoking marijuana. Unfortunately, no kind of database exists in Quakeworld. The closest thing our community has is qwrama’s very own wiki; however, the wiki serves more as a reference to names and clans and the like. It does not explain concepts that are based on social sciences like psychology or sociology. Furthermore, economics can explain probabilities and percentages using game theory.

Can such a database be constructed? (read more..)